4.4. Potential EvapotranspirationΒΆ

Potential evapotranspiration represents the atmospheric demand for water vapour in the absence of supply limitation. ADELM evaluates it separately for five pathways: soil surface evaporation (potential_surface_evaporation), ground snow sublimation (potential_snow_sublimation), wet-canopy evaporation (potential_canopy_evaporation), canopy sublimation (potential_canopy_sublimation), and transpiration (potential_transpiration). The hydrology module then constrains each flux by available water storage.

Coupling to other components

1. Potential surface evaporation and sublimationΒΆ

Potential surface evaporation potential_surface_evaporation [mm day-1; Diagnostic: atmospheric demand for evaporation from the snow-free soil surface] follows the Penman-Monteith form:

(4.4.1)ΒΆ\[E_{\mathrm{soil,pot}} = \frac{ s\,R^{\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{g}} + \rho_{\mathrm{a}} c_p \Delta e_{\mathrm{soil}}/r_{\mathrm{a,soil}} }{ \lambda_{\mathrm{v}} \left[ s + \gamma\left(1 + \dfrac{r_{\mathrm{ss}}}{r_{\mathrm{a,soil}}}\right) \right] }\]

The soil net radiation \(R^{\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{g}}\) (soil_net_radiation_Wm2 [W m-2; Flux: net radiative flux at the soil surface]) is

(4.4.2)ΒΆ\[R^{\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{g}} = R^{\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{lw},\mathrm{g}} + R^{\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{sw},\mathrm{g}}\]

Symbol

ADELM variables

\(R^{\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{lw},\mathrm{g}}\)

soil_net_lwrad_Wm2 [W m-2; Flux: longwave radiative flux absorbed by the soil surface]

\(R^{\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{sw},\mathrm{g}}\)

soil_net_swrad_Wm2 [W m-2; Flux: shortwave radiative flux absorbed by the soil surface (visible plus near-infrared)]

\(s\)

saturation_vapour_pressure_slope [kPa K-1; Diagnostic: rate of change of saturation vapour pressure with temperature]

\(\rho_{\mathrm{a}}\)

air_density [kg m-3; Diagnostic: mass of air per unit volume]

\(c_p\)

specific_heat_capacity_air [default: 1004.6 J kg-1 K-1; Constant: specific heat capacity of air]

\(\Delta e_{\mathrm{soil}}\)

soil_to_air_vapour_pressure_gradient [kPa; Diagnostic: difference between soil-surface vapour pressure and near-surface air vapour pressure]

\(r_{\mathrm{a,soil}}\)

soil_aerodynamic_conductance [m s-1; Diagnostic: aerodynamic conductance for water vapour transport between the soil surface and the canopy air]

\(r_{\mathrm{ss}}\)

soil_surface_conductance [m s-1; Diagnostic: soil surface conductance to water vapour]

\(\lambda_{\mathrm{v}}\)

latent_heat_of_vaporization [J kg-1; Diagnostic: energy required to vaporize one kilogram of liquid water]

\(\gamma\)

psychrometric_constant [kPa K-1; Diagnostic: ratio of sensible to latent heat flux for a wet surface at constant pressure]

Potential ground snow sublimation potential_snow_sublimation [mm day-1; Diagnostic: atmospheric demand for sublimation from the ground snowpack] uses a separate Penman-Monteith formulation for an ice surface, with ice-phase thermodynamic quantities replacing the liquid-water equivalents:

(4.4.3)ΒΆ\[E_{\mathrm{snow,pot}} = \frac{ s_{\mathrm{ice}}\,R^{\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{g}} + \rho_{\mathrm{a}} c_p \Delta e_{\mathrm{ice}}/r_{\mathrm{a,soil}} }{ \lambda_{\mathrm{s}}\left(s_{\mathrm{ice}} + \gamma_{\mathrm{s}}\right) }\]

where \(s_{\mathrm{ice}}\) is the slope of the saturation vapour pressure curve over ice, \(\Delta e_{\mathrm{ice}} = \max(e_{\mathrm{sat,ice}}(T_{\mathrm{a}}) - e_{\mathrm{a}},\,0)\) is the ice-surface vapour pressure deficit, \(\gamma_{\mathrm{s}} = \gamma\,\lambda_{\mathrm{v}}/\lambda_{\mathrm{s}}\) is the psychrometric constant for the sublimation pathway, and \(\lambda_{\mathrm{s}}\) is latent_heat_of_sublimation [default: 2.836e+06 J kg-1; Constant: latent heat of sublimation of water at 0Β°C].

2. Potential wet-canopy evaporation and sublimationΒΆ

Potential wet-canopy evaporation demand potential_canopy_liquid_evaporation [mm day-1; Diagnostic: atmospheric demand for evaporation from wet canopy surfaces] is

(4.4.4)ΒΆ\[E_{\mathrm{can,liq,pot}} = \frac{ s\,R^{\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{v}} + \rho_{\mathrm{a}} c_p \mathrm{VPD}/r_{\mathrm{a}} }{ \lambda_{\mathrm{v}}\left[s + \gamma\left(1 + \dfrac{r_{\mathrm{b}}}{r_{\mathrm{a}}}\right)\right] }\]

where \(r_{\mathrm{a}} = 1/g_{\mathrm{a,above}}\) is the above-canopy aerodynamic resistance and \(r_{\mathrm{b}} = 1/g_{\mathrm{b}}\) is the leaf boundary layer resistance. In ADELM, the aerodynamic numerator uses the above-canopy path, and the denominator includes the extra leaf boundary layer resistance.

The canopy net radiation \(R^{\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{v}}\) (canopy_net_radiation_Wm2 [W m-2; Flux: net radiative flux at the canopy surface]) is

(4.4.5)ΒΆ\[R^{\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{v}} = R^{\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{lw},\mathrm{v}} + R^{\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{sw},\mathrm{v}}\]

Symbol

ADELM variables

\(R^{\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{lw},\mathrm{v}}\)

canopy_net_lwrad_Wm2 [W m-2; Flux: longwave radiative flux absorbed by the canopy]

\(R^{\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{sw},\mathrm{v}}\)

canopy_net_swrad_Wm2 [W m-2; Flux: shortwave radiative flux absorbed by the canopy]

\(\rho_{\mathrm{a}}\)

air_density [kg m-3; Diagnostic: mass of air per unit volume]

\(c_p\)

specific_heat_capacity_air [default: 1004.6 J kg-1 K-1; Constant: specific heat capacity of air]

\(\mathrm{VPD}\)

vpd_kPa [kPa; Driver: vapour pressure deficit]

\(g_{\mathrm{a,above}}\)

above_canopy_aerodynamic_conductance [m s-1; Diagnostic: aerodynamic conductance for water vapour transport from the canopy top to the reference height]

\(g_{\mathrm{b}}\)

leaf_boundary_layer_conductance [m s-1; Diagnostic: bulk conductance for water vapour across the laminar boundary layer of canopy leaves]

Potential canopy sublimation potential_canopy_sublimation [mm day-1; Diagnostic: atmospheric demand for sublimation of solid-phase water stored on the canopy] is then

(4.4.6)ΒΆ\[E_{\mathrm{sub,pot}} = E_{\mathrm{can,liq,pot}}\,\frac{\lambda_{\mathrm{v}}}{\lambda_{\mathrm{s}}}\]

where \(\lambda_{\mathrm{s}}\) is latent_heat_of_sublimation [default: 2.836e+06 J kg-1; Constant: latent heat of sublimation of water at 0Β°C]. Because \(\lambda_{\mathrm{s}} > \lambda_{\mathrm{v}}\), the sublimation demand is smaller than the corresponding wet-canopy evaporation demand.

3. Potential transpirationΒΆ

See also

model.processes.evapotranspiration.calculate_potential_transpiration()

Potential transpiration potential_canopy_transpiration [mm day-1; Diagnostic: maximum water vapour flux from canopy leaves to the atmosphere] follows the Penman-Monteith form with explicit stomatal resistance:

(4.4.7)ΒΆ\[E_{\mathrm{tr,pot}} = \frac{ s\,R^{\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{v}} + \rho_{\mathrm{a}} c_p \mathrm{VPD}/r_{\mathrm{a}} }{ \lambda_{\mathrm{v}} \left[ s + \gamma\left(1 + \dfrac{r_{\mathrm{c}} + r_{\mathrm{b}}}{r_{\mathrm{a}}}\right) \right] }\]

Canopy stomatal conductance \(g_{\mathrm{s,can}}\) (canopy_stomatal_conductance [mmol H2O m-2 s-1; Diagnostic: canopy-scale stomatal conductance to water vapour]) is converted from millimolar conductance by

(4.4.8)ΒΆ\[g_{\mathrm{s,can}} = \frac{g_{\mathrm{s,can,mmol}}}{g_{\mathrm{mmol}}}\]

where \(g_{\mathrm{mmol}} = 10^3 \times\) air_molar_density [mol m-3; Diagnostic: molar concentration of air].

The corresponding stomatal resistance is \(r_{\mathrm{c}} = 1 / g_{\mathrm{s,can}}\), while \(r_{\mathrm{a}} = 1 / g_{\mathrm{a,above}}\) and \(r_{\mathrm{b}} = 1 / g_{\mathrm{b}}\) are the same above-canopy and leaf boundary layer resistances used in the wet-canopy calculation.